Table 4 Perceived constraints for BIM-implementation
Statement (1 totally disagree, 5 totally agree) | Rank | Mean | Max | Min | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No demands from the clients | 1 | 3.71 | 5 | 1 | 1.22 |
Our partners do not use BIM | 2 | 3.61 | 5 | 1 | 1.10 |
High investments in hard- and software | 3 | 3.50 | 5 | 1 | 1.09 |
No internal demand in the company | 4 | 3.48 | 5 | 1 | 1.34 |
Problem with the user-friendliness | 5 | 3.08 | 5 | 1 | 1.03 |
High demands for technical competence | 6 | 3.07 | 5 | 1 | 1.00 |
Partners do not always give access to the 3-D model | 7 | 3.00 | 5 | 1 | 1.24 |
Does not give any clear competitive advantages | 8 | 3.00 | 5 | 1 | 1.37 |
Difficult to integrate with other systems | 9 | 2.91 | 5 | 1 | 1.06 |
Takes a long time to learn | 10 | 2.83 | 5 | 1 | 1.00 |
Expensive operating and maintenance costs | 11 | 2.67 | 5 | 1 | 1.31 |
BIM-models are too complex | 12 | 2.63 | 5 | 1 | 1.22 |
The information in the model is often wrong | 13 | 2.38 | 5 | 1 | 0.79 |
Major internal resistance in the company | 14 | 2.32 | 5 | 1 | 1.15 |
Difficult to know if BIM will persist in the future (a fashion) | 15 | 1.90 | 5 | 1 | 1.03 |