Skip to main content

Table 2 Results for respondents that “never read any codes”

From: A logic-based representation and tree-based visualization method for building regulatory requirements

Representation

Total Score

Understandability (simple regulatory requirement)

Reading Speed (simple regulatory requirement)

Understandability (complex regulatory requirement)

Reading Speed (complex regulatory requirement)

Text

53.5

51.5

49

49.5

Equivalent Percentage

61.5%

59.2%

56.3%

56.9%

 99% CI

(47.7%, 73.7%)

(45.4%, 71.6%)

(42.7%, 69.1%)

(43.2%, 69.6%)

 95% CI

(51.0%, 71.0%)

(48.7%, 68.9%)

(45.9%, 66.3%)

(46.4%, 66.8%)

 90% CI

(52.7%, 69.4%)

(50.4%, 67.5%)

(47.5%, 64.7%)

(48.1%, 65.3%)

Logic

28.5

26.5

26

26

Equivalent Percentage

32.8%

30.5%

29.9%

29.9%

 99% CI

(21.4%, 46.5%)

(19.5%, 44.2%)

(19.0%, 43.6%)

(19.0%, 43.6%)

 95% CI

(23.8%, 43.2%)

(21.8%, 40.8%)

(21.3%, 40.2%)

(21.3%, 40.2%)

 90% CI

(25.1%, 41.4%)

(23.0%, 39.1%)

(22.5%, 38.5%)

(22.5%, 38.5%)

Visual

50

50

49

48.5

Equivalent Percentage

57.5%

57.5%

56.3%

55.7%

 99% CI

(43.8%, 70.1%)

(43.8%, 70.1%)

(42.7%, 69.1%)

(42.1%, 68.6%)

 95% CI

(47.0%, 67.3%)

(47.0%, 67.3%)

(45.9%, 66.3%)

(45.3%, 65.7%)

 90% CI

(48.7%, 65.8%)

(48.7%, 65.8%)

(47.5%, 64.7%)

(46.9%, 64.2%)