Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 2 Results for respondents that “never read any codes”

From: A logic-based representation and tree-based visualization method for building regulatory requirements

Representation Total Score
Understandability (simple regulatory requirement) Reading Speed (simple regulatory requirement) Understandability (complex regulatory requirement) Reading Speed (complex regulatory requirement)
Text 53.5 51.5 49 49.5
Equivalent Percentage 61.5% 59.2% 56.3% 56.9%
 99% CI (47.7%, 73.7%) (45.4%, 71.6%) (42.7%, 69.1%) (43.2%, 69.6%)
 95% CI (51.0%, 71.0%) (48.7%, 68.9%) (45.9%, 66.3%) (46.4%, 66.8%)
 90% CI (52.7%, 69.4%) (50.4%, 67.5%) (47.5%, 64.7%) (48.1%, 65.3%)
Logic 28.5 26.5 26 26
Equivalent Percentage 32.8% 30.5% 29.9% 29.9%
 99% CI (21.4%, 46.5%) (19.5%, 44.2%) (19.0%, 43.6%) (19.0%, 43.6%)
 95% CI (23.8%, 43.2%) (21.8%, 40.8%) (21.3%, 40.2%) (21.3%, 40.2%)
 90% CI (25.1%, 41.4%) (23.0%, 39.1%) (22.5%, 38.5%) (22.5%, 38.5%)
Visual 50 50 49 48.5
Equivalent Percentage 57.5% 57.5% 56.3% 55.7%
 99% CI (43.8%, 70.1%) (43.8%, 70.1%) (42.7%, 69.1%) (42.1%, 68.6%)
 95% CI (47.0%, 67.3%) (47.0%, 67.3%) (45.9%, 66.3%) (45.3%, 65.7%)
 90% CI (48.7%, 65.8%) (48.7%, 65.8%) (47.5%, 64.7%) (46.9%, 64.2%)