Skip to main content

Table 3 Results for respondents that “read codes before but not building codes”

From: A logic-based representation and tree-based visualization method for building regulatory requirements

Representation

Total Score

Understandability (simple regulatory requirement)

Reading Speed (simple regulatory requirement)

Understandability (complex regulatory requirement)

Reading Speed (complex regulatory requirement)

Text

42.5

39.5

37

36

Equivalent Percentage

83.3%

77.5%

72.5%

70.6%

 99% CI

(66.3%, 92.7%)

(59.8%, 88.8%)

(54.6%, 85.3%)

(52.6%, 83.9%)

 95% CI

(70.9%, 91.1%)

(64.3%, 86.8%)

(59.1%, 82.9%)

(57.0%, 81.3%)

 90% CI

(73.1%, 90.2%)

(66.6%, 85.5%)

(61.3%, 81.5%)

(59.3%, 79.8%)

Logic

16.5

14.5

16

15

Equivalent Percentage

32.4%

28.4%

31.4%

29.4%

 99% CI

(18.4%, 50.4%)

(15.4%, 46.4%)

(17.6%, 49.4%)

(16.1%, 47.4%)

 95% CI

(21.1%, 46.0%)

(17.9%, 42.0%)

(20.3%, 45.0%)

(18.7%, 43.0%)

 90% CI

(22.7%, 43.8%)

(19.3%, 39.7%)

(21.9%, 42.8%)

(20.2%, 40.7%)

Visual

33

30

33

29

Equivalent Percentage

64.7%

58.8%

64.7%

56.9%

 99% CI

(46.7%, 79.3%)

(41.1%, 74.5%)

(46.7%, 79.3%)

(39.3%, 72.9%)

 95% CI

(51.0%, 76.4%)

(45.2%, 71.2%)

(51.0%, 76.4%)

(43.3%, 69.5%)

 90% CI

(53.2%, 74.7%)

(47.3%, 69.4%)

(53.2%, 74.7%)

(45.4%, 67.6%)