Visualization in Engineering operates a double-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers do not know the names or affiliations of the authors and the reviewer reports provided to the authors are anonymous.
The benefit of double-blind peer review is that it allows reviewers to judge the manuscript based on content alone, and they are not unconsciously biased by knowledge of who the authors are.
Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board.
We are pleased to announce that Visualization in Engineering has been accepted for inclusion in Scopus, the world's largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature. See the journal indexing here.
2017 Journal Metrics
95.5 days from submission to first decision
192.5 days from submission to acceptance
24.9 days from acceptance to publication
62 Altmetric Mentions
- ISSN: 2213-7459